Why do couples use their most precious possessions as ammunition?
Here’s a question for family lawyers: how many times have you been involved in a final hearing about child contact, the fight for that extra half-hour; the struggle over how the four-year-old should be ‘shared’ on Christmas day? What about couples bartering maintenance for child contact time? CAFCASS officers becoming involved, three year olds interviewed to ascertain what’s in their ‘best interests’?
Many marriages are not going to last for ever, but co-parenting will!
Helping couples create a co-parenting agreement through mediation is a solid and gratifying way forward for many parents although left until too late in the separation process, mediation is often less successful. Mediation is now more centrally positioned in legal thinking and produces excellent results. However, here are eight scenarios for divorcing parents, from the mediation caseload, about how ‘not’ to do it.
Children are resilient but not Teflon-coated…..
- One parent who ‘badmouths’ the other, to the 6 year old during a contact visit.
- One parent being so psychologically ‘needy’ after separation that the 10 year old feels he must look after her.
- The 5 year old child feeling ‘disloyal’ to one parent if he says he enjoyed his contact day with the other.
- The 8 year old finding herself in the position of covering up the fact that she has met her dad’s new girlfriend.
- The screaming row, between parents, in the street when dad is 30 minutes late returning the children after contact.
- The resentment from mum when dad buys new clothes for the 7 year old during her stay with him. (The clothes have ended up in the dustbin).
- The fighting, and legal letters, concerning the amount of contact time that each parent ‘deserves’.
- The 7 year old boy caught in the middle of a contact dispute, who is on his third round of clinical psychology for ‘anxiety and depression’
So what do children say they want?
· Love, stability and a calm atmosphere
· Mum and dad to get on better whether they’re together or apart.
· Not being asked to choose between their parents
· Not being the focal point of their parents’ battle
· Being allowed to love both their parents equally without feeling guilty, or disloyal to one.
· Being allowed to have a ‘primary’ bedroom in a ‘primary’ home with easy, stress-free access to the other parent’s home.
· Relaxed communication with one parent when staying with the other.
· To not be treated as a ‘possession’ but as a real person who will be a future adult.
· Space to communicate their worries and express their feelings about their family’s breakdown.
· Support to manage changes and come to terms with their situation.
· To feel less isolated.
Therapeutic support:
Solicitors may feel that their brief is limited to applying the law to the facts, but they are also well placed (and it is good client-care) to help divorcing parents to support their children’s emotional needs. There are excellent therapeutic organisations to which professionals can refer children going through the divorce experience. One particularly recommended is www.akidspace.co.uk. These child-therapists run talking groups for children caught up in separation and divorce. The children have often felt that no one else understands what they are going through; the group enables them to meet others who are in similar situations and are encouraged to offer peer-support and group problem-solving. One child told his father after the first group that he felt like a weight had been lifted off his shoulders.
So solicitors, barristers, mediators, therapists, relationship counsellors, let’s not sit by and watch children being torn apart; help is available. Let’s have an eye to the ‘fallout’ in divorce and support the children towards more solid ground.
For akidscape contact Emma on 07980 556174.
Jacky Lewis
Mediation Matters London
You raise some familiar scenarios! I have noticed that one of the biggest changes in my practice is that I have become much more able and willing to confront these issues with clients in a way that i didn't feel able to when I started practising. Not long into my career I did an initial client interview with a woman that brought her 11 year old son with her and periodically said "you don't want to see your Dad, do you" through the interview. I have always regretted not saying that her child shouldn't be present. In my defence I was young, inexperienced and without any support. Now I actively encourage to confront children issues at an early stage and to refuse to let them be present in meetings - even young children.
ReplyDeleteI also routinely refer clients to outside sources to deal with problems at an early stage and flag these issues. I'm not perfect but I'm getting better and your blog contains good "bear in mind" points.
Everything you say makes sense but too often one parent at least is so obsessed with their hatred of the other they see their child's difficulties as a victory to prove how bad the other parent is.
ReplyDeleteHi Lynne, thank you for this comment - I so agree. An interesting paper could be written on what I term in the blog as the 'leaver' (the person who wants to end the relationship and has already left it in his imagination), and the 'left', (who in my experience often feels shame, abandonment, unfairness, despair, vengefulness and a despire to hurt...). The most effective weapon, then, to hand is the children, whom one uses to punish the other. I feel often that the lawyers need support in identifying this dynamic and working in some way with it in a better way together. Perhaps I'll write more about how solicitors could do this, my next blog. Best wishes,Jacky
ReplyDelete